The jury's speedy conviction of Sam Bankman-Fried, founder of FTX, on seven criminal charges demonstrates the strength of the government's case. In spite of a month of witness accounts and hundreds of documents introduced as evidence, it only required a three-hour deliberation for the jurors to convict the defendant. "That's a testament to the power of the government's argument," Paul Tuchmann, a partner at Wiggin and Dana LLP and former federal prosecutor, stated.
At Sam Bankman-Fried's fraud trial, prosecutors were victorious in a remarkably short period of time. Jurors only needed three hours to find the FTX founder guilty of seven criminal counts, which could potentially add up to a life sentence. This month-long case featured over 20 witnesses and numerous exhibits, a landmark statistic according to experts. Yesha Yadav, professor of law and associate dean at Vanderbilt University, remarked, "The jury came to a conclusion next to no time on seven counts of fraud and conspiracy, which is a charge usually hard to prove beyond a reasonable doubt for complex economic misconduct."The prosecution and defense both noticed $10 billion of FTX customers' money went amiss and a lot of it went to real estate deals, refinanced loans, venture investments, and political donations, all of which were ordered by Bankman-Fried. There was general agreement that stealing money is wrong, yet the jury nevertheless had to determine whether Bankman-Fried maliciously committed fraud or just made a few misguided decisions.Nicolas Roos and Danielle Sassoon, the two assistant U.S. attorneys who led the prosecution, guided jurors with the message that ordinary investors suffered due to the missing billions. Crypto may be unpredictable because of its unregulated nature, but this was inconsequential for the current case at hand.The first witness testified about losing $100,000 on FTX, a London-based cocoa bean trading platform. Marc-Antoine Julliard had invested with FTX in 2021 because the company seemed reliable.The issues of the case were straightforward and this worked in the government's favor. As former prosecutor Renato Mariotti, now a trial partner in Chicago with Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, explained, "The simpler story is typically the victor at a jury trial." U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Damian Williams, echoed this sentiment when his spoke at the press briefing following the verdicts on Thursday evening: "This case has always been concerning duplicity, dishonesty, and stealing, and we have no patience for it making this case timeless.
Prosecutors were in a strong position. Bankman-Fried, the 31-year-old son of two Stanford legal scholars, had neglected legal counsel following the bankruptcy of FTX and Alameda Research in late 2022. He's been very vocal and open in his communication with the press, going as far as to do an interview with New York Times journalist Andrew Ross Sorkin three weeks after his crypto empire failed. When Sorkin asked, "What do your lawyers tell you right now? Are they suggesting this is a good idea for you to be speaking?", Bankman-Fried answered, “No, they are very much not. The classic advice—don't say anything, recede into a hole. And that's not who I am. It's not who I want to be." The prosecutors used this and other interviews, recordings and news stories before, during, and after the collapse of FTX as a large body of evidence against him along with damning witness testimony.
In September 2022, when the scope of the crisis became identifiable internally, Bankman-Fried informed CNBC that he had $1 billion in liquidity to apply across the industry. The subsequent month, during an event in Washington, D.C., he proclaimed the part FTX had played in furthering the sector through a deluge of breakdowns. When presenting these testimonies to the jury, the prosecution highlighted that Bankman-Fried was cognizant of that he was being mendacious. Mariotti claimed that SBF was doomed even before they started the case due to his refusal to stop lying even after discovering that he was being investigated. Sassoon expounded on this by telling the jurors that Bankman-Fried assumed he could fool everyone, which led to her concluding request for the jurors to find him guilty. Wiggin and Dana LLP partner and former federal prosecutor Paul Tuchmann stated that the three-hour jury deliberation period for such a long trial was very uncommon, which went to demonstrate the strength of the government's case. In addition to witnesses from Bankman-Fried's clique, providing evidence as part of their plea bargains, the defense's case mainly revolved around his own statements which Tuchmann described as 'unpersuasive'.
Caroline Ellison, Bankman-Fried's ex-girlfriend and former head of Alameda, starred for the prosecution. At the stand, she pleaded guilty to a number of charges and stated that she and Bankman-Fried had committed fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, and money laundering. Jury members heard Ellison on tape explaining the large deficit in FTX's balance sheet and the customer funds that had gone missing. They also witnessed text messages exchanged between Ellison and Bankman-Fried, including one in which she expressed relief that the whole ordeal was coming to a close. James Koutoulas, the trial's lawyer, declared nobody had defended Bankman-Fried as they should not have, and commented that the short panel deliberation proved this.
In addition to Ellison, the government presented Gary Wang, Bankman-Fried's math camp friend and FTX co-founder, FTX's former director of engineering Nishad Singh, and Bankman-Fried's former flatmate and senior FTX coder Adam Yedidia, and FTX's ex-general counsel Can Sun. According to Kevin J. O'Brien, who holds expertise in white collar criminal defense, the prosecution included several former senior executives of the companies who had credibly labelled Bankman-Fried as the scheme's leader. The defense team, lead by Mark Cohen, tried to cast doubt on the prosecution's claims, but this was unsuccessful.
Bankman-Fried's testimony ultimately worked against him - during questioning by his lawyer he formulated lengthy and complicated sentences which were often repetitive, and he rarely gave more than a "Yup" or "I don't recall" during cross-examination. O'Brien suggested these statement were unreliable and unsuccessful. Andrew Mariotti applauded the Justice Department for the efficiency and effectiveness with which they worked with the Commodities Future Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Finally, Mariotti pointed out Bankman-Fried would be remembered as one of the biggest fraudsters in recent times and that he had finally met his match.
Comments