Harriet Kelsall, a jeweller, has declared that the widely-used AI chatbot ChatGPT is not her choice despite it having 180 million users.
Although she recognizes that her dyslexia may be alleviated by using it, she confesses that she is still unable to trust it for enhancing her communication with customers on her website.
Ms. Kelsall, based in Nottingham, experimented with ChatGPT this year and found mistakes. To test it, she asked questions concerning the St Edward's Crown, such as what was used for King Charles III's coronation in May.
She stated that she had asked ChatGPT for some data on the crown and was curious as to what it would say. She was well-informed about jewels in the regal crowns and noticed that sizable pieces of the output were about the incorrect crown.
Ms Kelsall is worried about the possibility of people crediting a ChatGPT-created idea as their own, and stealing it.
Do you want to know what Artificial Intelligence (AI) is? Then this guide will provide you with a basic understanding of this technological concept.
Since its launch a year ago, ChatGPT has seen immense success; however, it appears that Ms Kelsall's aversion to it is a sentiment shared by many women, as opposed to men. Data from an earlier survey reveals that only 35% of women utilise AI in their personal or professional lives compared to 54% of men.
What accounts for this gap in AI that appears to be gender-based, and should it be of worry?
Leivars, who is based in London and acts as a business consultant, has chosen to not incorporate AI in her writing as she wishes to continue to have her own distinctive tone and identity.
She states that her clients booked sessions with her because the writing on her website was unique and felt personalized. People who know her have visited the website and recognized her voice in the words right away.
Whilst resident in London, Hayley Bystram has not looked to utilise AI to save herself time. Bystram is behind the formation of matchmaking enterprise Bowes-Lyon Partnership, and meets her customers personally in order to pair them with similar personalities, excluding any computational processes.
She mentions a potential use for ChatGPT in their meticulously crafted member profiles, which can take up to a full day to generate. However, she is reluctant to use it as it would take away the soul of the work and make it feel like a shortcut, so they persist in using the more strenuous process.
For Alexandra Coward, a business strategist based in Paisley, Scotland, utilizing AI for content creation is comparable to "heavy photoshopping".
She is especially worried about the increasing tendency of people to utilize AI to fabricate pictures that make them seem as thin, young, and trendy as they possibly can.
Ms Coward states: "We're heading into a world where not only will your clients be unable to recognise you face-to-face, you won't be able to recognise yourself either."
Despite the potential justifications given, Jodie Cook, an AI specialist, believes that women are not engaging with AI as much as men due to certain ingrained reasons.
Ms Cook, the founder of Coachvox.ai (an app allowing business leaders to create AI clones of themselves), remarks that realms of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics have customarily been male-dominated.
It seems that the trend of utilizing AI tools reflects the disparity, as the aptitudes necessary for AI are based on Stem disciplines.
Peruse extra accounts on synthetic intelligence
In the UK, only 24% of Stem sector employees are female, which can lead to "women not feeling confident when engaging with AI tools", states Ms Cook. Such technology does not usually require advanced technical knowledge but, if women do not view themselves as being technically competent, they may be discouraged from trying it.
AI still retains a sense of being science fiction. Promotion of science fiction in the media and popular culture is typically targeted at male audiences.
Ms Cook remarks that, as the AI sector progresses, she would like more women to utilise and work in it. "We certainly don't want to see a difference between men and women as the industry expands," she adds.
Lee Chambers, a psychologist, states that certain female thinking and behaviour may be obstructing some women from engaging with AI.
According to him, it's a confidence gap: Women usually desire to be quite capable in something before they begin to utilize it, whereas men are generally content to plunge into something with minimal expertise.
Mr Chambers stated that women may be hesitant about utilizing AI tools, out of apprehension that their competency might be called into question.
He believes that women are more likely to be questioned about their competence, so they must emphasize their qualifications further to prove their expertise in a specific area. There can be a perception that a woman's use of AI implies that she may not be as capable as she really is.
Women face prejudices that discredit them and their ideas, making it likely that the ideas of men will be taken and credited to them instead. Knowing that an AI is being used could work against a woman in this context, implying that she is not sufficiently capable or valuable. This is an additional insult to her knowledge and abilities.
As Harriet Kelsall articulates, she places a great emphasis on genuineness and the capacity to create.
Comments